Elementrica
03Case Studies04References05Company06News07Contact
PLENDE

WEB3 APPLICATION PENETRATION TESTING

Web3 application penetration testing: in Web3 a code bug is lost funds

Smart contract audits and Web3 application testing, run by pentesters who combine blockchain knowledge with classic security. Contract logic, access control and off-chain components.

Smart contract and dApp layer auditReentrancy, access control, oracle manipulationOff-chain components and bridgesReport with evidence and recommendations

WHY IT MATTERS

On-chain code is public, immutable and holds real money

Once deployed, a smart contract is visible to everyone and usually cannot be quietly patched. Anyone can analyze and call it, and if it manages funds, a logic bug turns instantly into a financial loss, often irreversible.

From a recent engagement: a withdrawal function updated the balance only after sending funds, opening the classic reentrancy attack that let the same tokens be withdrawn repeatedly. The logic looked correct under normal use, the problem only surfaced under a deliberate recursive call.

WHAT WE CHECK

From contract logic to off-chain components

01
Contract logic
Reentrancy, arithmetic bugs, operation ordering and unexpected states.
02
Access control
Unprotected admin functions, roles and ownership mechanisms.
03
Oracle manipulation
Dependence on prices and external data vulnerable to manipulation.
04
Front-running and MEV
Exposure to transaction ordering and value extraction from the mempool.
05
Signatures and replay
Signature validation errors, replay and nonce management.
06
Off-chain and bridges
The dApp layer, backend, keys and cross-chain bridges.

We tailor scope to the protocol: a single contract, a system of contracts or the full Web3 application.

OUR APPROACH

A manual audit supported by tools, not the other way round

Contract analysis tools detect known patterns, but real losses come from protocol-specific logic bugs. That is why the foundation is a manual review of the contract code and modeling of economic attack scenarios.

We also look beyond the contract itself: at the dApp layer, backend, key management and bridges. Many real incidents arise at the seam between on-chain and off-chain, which a pure contract audit misses.

TRUST

An audit your users and investors can see

In Web3, an independent security audit report is a condition of trust from the community, exchanges and investors.

Community trust
An independent audit as a standard condition for listing and protocol adoption.
Due diligence
Material for investors and partners confirming security maturity.
ISO 27001
Alignment with the organization’s security management system.

STANDARDS & CERTIFICATIONS

We work to recognized methodologies, not gut feeling

Every project is run by certified pentesters and based on public standards. That makes the result repeatable, auditable and comparable across vendors.

Team certifications
OSCPOSCPOffSec
OSEPOSEPOffSec
OSWEOSWEOffSec
OSEDOSEDOffSec
OSWAOSWAOffSec
OSWPOSWPOffSec
BSCPBSCPPortSwigger
CPTSCPTSHack The Box
CBBHCBBHHack The Box
CWEECWEEHack The Box
CRTOCRTOZero-Point Security
CREST CRTCREST CRTCREST
CREST CPSACREST CPSACREST
ISO 27001 LAISO 27001 LAISO/IEC
Azure Security EngineerAzure Security EngineerMicrosoft
Security Operations AnalystSecurity Operations AnalystMicrosoft
Security AdministratorSecurity AdministratorMicrosoft
OSCPOSCPOffSec
OSEPOSEPOffSec
OSWEOSWEOffSec
OSEDOSEDOffSec
OSWAOSWAOffSec
OSWPOSWPOffSec
BSCPBSCPPortSwigger
CPTSCPTSHack The Box
CBBHCBBHHack The Box
CWEECWEEHack The Box
CRTOCRTOZero-Point Security
CREST CRTCREST CRTCREST
CREST CPSACREST CPSACREST
ISO 27001 LAISO 27001 LAISO/IEC
Azure Security EngineerAzure Security EngineerMicrosoft
Security Operations AnalystSecurity Operations AnalystMicrosoft
Security AdministratorSecurity AdministratorMicrosoft
Methodologies
SWC RegistryPTESOWASP
Verification standards
OWASP ASVS 5.0.0
Scope
Smart contractsdApp layerOff-chain components

We share the full list of certifications and standards on request, together with a sample test scope.

HOW WE DO IT

A repeatable Web3 audit process

01
Scoping
We define the contracts, chains and architecture before we start.
02
Code review
We manually analyze contract logic and model attack scenarios.
03
Tool analysis
We complement the review with tools that detect known patterns.
04
Off-chain
We check the dApp layer, backend, keys and bridges.
05
Report and retest
We deliver a report with recommendations and re-verify after fixes.

EVIDENCE

Numbers behind every promise

Every test is run by certified pentesters, and we document the result with reproduction steps, evidence and a verified remediation path. Proof, not a promise.

500+
security tests and audits completed
5.0
average score from 10 verified Clutch reviews
20+
offensive certifications across the team
01
Certified team
20+ offensive certifications across the team (OSCP, OSEP, OSWE, CREST). Tests are run by our people, not anonymous subcontractors.
02
Manual testing
We work by hand to PTES and OWASP, chaining seemingly small flaws into a real, proven attack path.
03
Evidence, not a promise
Every finding comes with reproduction steps and a working proof. A report that holds up in front of an auditor.
04
Retest included
After fixes are deployed we confirm in writing that the gaps are closed. We do not vanish once the PDF is sent.

KNOWLEDGE

Web3 and smart contract penetration testing in practice

Why Web3 is tested differently

In Web3 code once deployed to the blockchain is public and often immutable, and a flaw can mean an irreversible loss of funds. There is no fixing it in production after the fact, so testing before deployment is crucial.

We check not only the smart contract itself but its surroundings: the application logic, integrations and the points where it touches the off-chain world. That is where, at the system boundaries, the real risk most often arises.

What we analyze in smart contracts

We analyze the contract logic for common classes of flaw, such as reentrancy, access control errors, arithmetic problems and unsafe assumptions about transaction ordering. We combine code analysis with testing the contract behavior in a controlled environment.

We also look at dependencies and economic patterns, because an attack does not have to break the code to abuse it. Sometimes it is enough to exploit how the contract reacts to an unusual but permitted sequence of actions.

The most common and most costly flaws

The most dangerous Web3 vulnerabilities concern access control to key functions and the logic that moves funds. A single permission flaw can allow a contract takeover or the draining of accumulated assets.

Equally important are flaws in assumptions about trust in off-chain data and in other contracts. So we test not only the code but whether its assumptions survive contact with a hostile environment.

What you get and when to test

The report describes every vulnerability with evidence, a risk rating and a concrete remediation recommendation a development team can understand. We also explain a realistic abuse scenario so it is clear exactly what is at stake.

A smart contract is worth testing before deployment to mainnet and after every significant change to the logic. In Web3 this order is critical, because after deployment a fix can be costly or even impossible.

FAQ

Common questions

Which chains and languages do you support?

Most often Solidity contracts on EVM-compatible networks. We confirm other ecosystems during scoping.

How is an audit different from an app test?

A contract audit focuses on on-chain logic. We also cover the off-chain and dApp layer, because real incidents often arise at their seam.

Do you need the contract code?

Yes. The audit is based on the contract source code, ideally with tests and protocol documentation.

Do you verify the fixes?

Yes. After changes are made we re-check the indicated places and confirm the flaws are gone.

RELATED

Related reading

CASE STUDIES

Case studies in this area

REFERENCES

“The project was delivered professionally and on time, with a strong grasp of both technology and business. We were impressed by their cybersecurity expertise and partnership approach.”
M
Mateusz Widenka
Head of Delivery, Order Group
Clutch★★★★★5.0 · 10 reviewsRead all reviews on Clutch

FIRST STEP

Start with a free consultation

Tell us what you want tested. Within 24 hours you get a proposed scope and next steps. You talk to a consultant who understands the technical side, not a salesperson.

Get in touch
No obligation · we reply within 24 h · your data stays confidential
Methodology
PTES · OWASP
Team
20+ certifications
Rating
5.0 on Clutch
What you get
A scope proposal matched to your risk
A report with evidence and reproduction steps
Remediation priorities by real impact
A retest after fixes are deployed
Asia, ElementricaKacper, ElementricaGrzesiek, Elementrica
A member of our team runs the call, and we reply within 24 hours. No bots, no call center.